<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Makes These Spell Checkers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Janak - upon further research it seems that both &quot;skeptical&quot; and &quot;sceptical&quot; are accepted spellings of the word - and you&#039;re right, Word was telling me that &quot;sceptical&quot; was the correct spelling, but I&#039;ve never encountered that spelling before, so I was a bit...skeptical that it was right. The Firefox spell checker is also flagging &quot;skeptical&quot; as the incorrect spelling. But how do you explain &quot;movies&quot;? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janak &#8211; upon further research it seems that both &#8220;skeptical&#8221; and &#8220;sceptical&#8221; are accepted spellings of the word &#8211; and you&#8217;re right, Word was telling me that &#8220;sceptical&#8221; was the correct spelling, but I&#8217;ve never encountered that spelling before, so I was a bit&#8230;skeptical that it was right. The Firefox spell checker is also flagging &#8220;skeptical&#8221; as the incorrect spelling. But how do you explain &#8220;movies&#8221;? <img src='http://www.jasondunn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janak Parekh</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Janak Parekh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Jason, can you check your language setting?  Perhaps &quot;sceptical&quot; is what the spellchecker is expecting? ;)

In general, I&#039;ve had very few problems with MS spellcheckers.  Now, grammar-checking is another thing entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, can you check your language setting?  Perhaps &#8220;sceptical&#8221; is what the spellchecker is expecting? <img src='http://www.jasondunn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In general, I&#8217;ve had very few problems with MS spellcheckers.  Now, grammar-checking is another thing entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctmagnus</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138/comment-page-1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>ctmagnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasondunn.com/who-makes-these-spell-checkers-138#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I once witnessed someone typing a long document that invariably had one typo. He would accept Word&#039;s suggested correction, but that would also be flagged as a typo. The suggested correction for that was his initial spelling, which then was flagged as a typo again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once witnessed someone typing a long document that invariably had one typo. He would accept Word&#8217;s suggested correction, but that would also be flagged as a typo. The suggested correction for that was his initial spelling, which then was flagged as a typo again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
