Category: Money & Investments

“The Crumbling of Concrete Equities” by Alberta Venture

This is an incredibly well-written and well-researched article about Concrete Equities – I’m not sure how I missed it when it was published in September 2009 (maybe because I was in new dad mode), but it’s worth a read for anyone involved in this debacle. This paragraph is particularly apt:

“Recently returned CEO Dave Jones played the absent founder; current president Vincenzo De Palma, whom you might recognize from Concrete’s TV ads, drew from a background mostly spent selling lumber out of Prince George, B.C.; 20-something executive Vinnie Aurora’s qualifications included being the son of a colleague of Jones; and, along with experience as an investment industry veteran, office manager Dave Humeniuk bore the albatross of a lifetime ban from selling real estate in the province of Alberta. The result: a corporate environment poisoned by infighting and finger-pointing and which produced no significant financial reporting, a lapsed mortgage, allegations of impropriety and incompetence, no dividends since the start of this year despite purportedly cash-positive properties, and, because of it all, more than 2,000 investors raring for a fight.”

If ever there was a cautionary tale for investors, this is it!

If for whatever reason the link above isn’t working, a copy of the article can be found here.

CBC News Story About Exempt Markets

A CBC news reporter, Dave Sims, contact me about a week ago for a story he was working on; he wanted permission to use photos of the Concrete Equities protests that happened in June of 2009. They weren’t my photos, so I couldn’t give permission, but thankfully Sims found someone who had some photos for his article, which you can check out here. I spoke to Dave on the phone about my opinions about exempt market funds, and it was summed up as follows:

“Jason Dunn, another Calgary investor who has lost at least $10,000 in the Concrete Equities collapse, doesn’t share that view. He wants investors to have as many choices as possible — even high-risk ones — but he does agree that investors should be protected against fraud.”

What I meant by that statement is that properly informed investors who are qualified to take the risks (accredited investors) involved in exempt markets should be allowed to do so. I believe that people should be able to do what they want with their money, even if it’s high risk.

However…when non-accredited investors who shouldn’t be investing in the first place get advice from their financial consultants to invest with a company that has financial links back to the financial consulting agency in question…when officers of the company in question engage in business practices that bankrupt the company…and when outright fraud is committed by officers of the company who take money for one investment and use it as a down-payment for another investment…something is obviously very wrong with the system. These people either believed they were too smart to get caught, or they weren’t afraid of the penalties.

I’m unsure of whether or not the current laws are strong enough to keep these types of people in check, or enough to protect investors until it’s too late – it certainly wasn’t enough to deter my financial consultant from signing paperwork saying we were except from the investor limitations because we were “friends or close business associates of the firm”. I’ve learned many hard and painful investing lessons over the past five years…the biggest of which is to never take any financial consultant at his word. Always investigate on your own; even a Google search on the names of the people involved will give you some measure of understanding about their track record in the industry. It amazes me – in a shameful way – that I spent hours researching which digital camera to spend $500 on, yet spent zero time researching the people wanting me to invest thousands of dollars with them. One of the many lessons I need to teach my son as he grows up…

The Canadian Business Forum Comments about Concrete Equities

Earlier this year, there were a couple of discussion threads started in the Canadian Business forums about Concrete Equities. The threads were full of useful information, and I posted in them several times. Curiously, right around the time that Vincenzo De Palma had his lawyers threaten to sue me for libel, the threads in the Canadian Business Forums were deleted. I don’t know why they were deleted – in fact a post I made there asking what happened was deleted – but it’s not hard to see the reasons why. Someone contacted me earlier this week about this topic; they’ve created a blog with all of the posts originally made to those Canadian Business Forum discussion threads about Concrete Equities. It makes for some interesting reading!

Are You a Promissory Note Holder With Wealthstreet?

As I mentioned in this previous blog post, for one year I was a promissory note holder with Wealthstreet here in Calgary. We loaned Wealthstreet the money, and got it back with 10% interest on top, and that was the end of it. They asked us if we wanted to re-invest it, and we declined. Others chose to re-invest, or invested for the first time within the past year, and now with Wealthstreet shutting their doors the holders of those promissory notes are wondering what they can do to get their money back. The building that Wealthstreet formerly occupied was purchased by a numbered company owned by Dave Jones, meaning it’s an asset with real value. If you are a holder of a promissory note from Wealthstreet and would like to get organized to take action, please send an email to ***@***. This email address does not go to me – that email address forwards to someone who is a current promissory note holder who is interested in hearing from other promissory note holders who want to take collective action.

UPDATE: The above email address no longer works. The person to whom it went has informed me that she’s no longer seeking other promissory note holders; she’s got a group of them together and they’re taking collective action.

Ernst & Young Calls Town Hall Meeting for Concrete Equities Investors

For those investors that haven’t yet been contacted, here’s the time and location of the next meeting for Concrete Equities investors:

Ernst & Young Town Hall Meeting
Nov. 10th, 2009, 7:00 PM
Telus Convention Centre
120-9th Ave. S.E. Calgary
Exhibition Hall D / E & Annex

I’ll be there, and am cautiously optimistic based on the tone of the email sent out by the steering committee.

David Humeniuk’s Teluric International Investments Ltd.

Look what I found on the Alberta Securities Commission Web site:

“Calgary-based Teluric International Investments Ltd., the Teluric Diversified Fund, David Humeniuk and Elizabeth Humeniuk have provided an Undertaking to the Executive Director of the Alberta Securities Commission (ASC).  The Undertaking comes after ASC staff identified that the parties failed to disclose in a Teluric Diversified Fund offering memorandum information required by Alberta securities laws.  No sales occurred pursuant to the offering memorandum, nor are any sales contemplated in the future. The Undertaking states that Teluric International Investments, the Teluric Diversified Fund, David and Elizabeth Humeniuk agree they will cease all trading and refrain from any further trading of Teluric Diversified Fund securities until such time as the Executive Director releases them from this Undertaking.”

Who’s Dave Humeniuk you might be wondering? Why, he was a Director at Concrete Equities of course! Some truly interesting things have been said about the Santa Clara Mexico investment in court documents involving Dave Humeniuk and Vincenzo De Palma (sort of a “he said, he said” thing), and I’m planning on publishing those in the next week or two. Court documents aren’t libel because they fall under Absolute Privilege. Any lawyer reading this knows that. The document relating to the above ASC action can be found here – in short, it says that Dave Humeniuk needed to “Disclose any penalty or sanction (including the reason for it and whether it is currently in effect) that has been in effect during the last 10 years against (i) a director, executive officer or control person of the issuer, or (ii) an issuer of which a person referred to in (i) above was a director, executive officer or control person at the time.”

It seems he didn’t do that, and that’s against the rules.

What Happened to Wealthstreet and Dave Jones?

Because this blog entry of mine comes up third in Google for the term Wealthstreet, I feel a certain responsibility to share some information with people who are searching for what happened to their investments.

For those that haven’t heard, Wealthstreet seems to be no more. Their phone numbers are disconnected, and while their Web site still loads, it hasn’t been updated in some time. The last time I spoke with anyone from Wealthstreet was back in May of this year (and it was a hushed conversation involving whispering), and I suspect that once the hosting bills go unpaid for a few more months, the Web site will go off-line. The good news here is that Wealthstreet was “only” a broker – so if you invested in AGCAPITA, First West Properties (formerly Averio), or the MOSAIC Fund, your investments aren’t impacted by Wealthstreet imploding. If only the same could be said for our Concrete Equities investments.

I was concerned about the Dragon Fund however – this was a fund created by Dave Jones, and while we didn’t have much money in it, I had pretty much given up hope of getting it back. This article had a few interesting comments that related to that fund. I’ll reproduce them here in case the source article gets deleted:

“I managed to talk to someone last week and it looks like Dave has laid off all of his staff and has closed his doors. In regards to investments I was told that if you have invested in anything other then the dragon fund your money is o.k. as Wealthstreet was only selling shares, not a partner in the investments. The dragon fund however is a different matter as this was Dave’s fund. Currently it is up in the air as to what will happen to this fund and the money that investors put into it. If Dave can sell it investors may get their money back or at least most of it, but if that fund goes down with the Wealthstreet then all the invested money could be lost.”

And this one:

“The above posting pretty much on point. Concrete is what is is…not good…not good at all. Investments such a Mosiac & AgCapital are still whole and seem to be run by quality fund managers. Wealthstreet was simply a ‘broker’ for these funds. Dragon Fund was simply marketed through WealthStreet who acted as a broker for this fund as well. It is entirely seperate from WealthStreet itself and is managed as a seperate entity by Dave Jones. The sole asset in Dragon Fund (bareland in Airdrie) is currently up for sale. If the land is sold the funds from the sale of the asset should be returned to investors.

The trustees on the fund are actively managing the situation and have significant control even though Dave Jones is the fund Adminstrator. The trustees are not in a postion to gain anything financially are definitely looking out for the best interest of the investors. Now if you are a ‘promissory’ note holder that is another investment I would be very concerned about! Good Luck!”

The problem of course is that I don’t know how to get in touch with these trustees of the Dragon Fund…a Google search has come up empty. Does anyone have any contact information for anyone related to the Dragon Fund? Continue reading What Happened to Wealthstreet and Dave Jones?

A Second Letter from Vincenzo De Palma’s Lawyer Claiming Libel

vincenzo-de-palma-second-libel-letter

Above is a screen shot of the PDF file I was sent via email today by one Becky Mansour, Jeff Bone’s legal assistant. In order to “govern myself accordingly”, I’ve contacted the firm of BURNET, DUCKWORTH & PALMER LLP to advise me on this matter. I find it puzzling that Mr. De Palma’s lawyers think that simply writing the name of their client on this site is libellous. In my understanding of libel law, writing someone’s name online cannot be considered libel. At any rate, I have the weekend to consider my options and the advice of counsel.

A Letter from Vincenzo De Palma’s Lawyer Claiming Libel

Fact: Vincenzo De Palma, President of Concrete Equities, has accused me of libel via his lawyer, Jeffrey Bone.

Fact: I received the following letter today, stating this:

Vincenzo-De-Palma-libel-accusation-letter-big

Fact: I phoned Jefferey Bone less than an hour ago to inquire which of my “remarks” they consider to be “defaming” and “disparaging”, but I was unable to get in touch with him. I’m waiting to hear back from him and cannot proceed until I get clarification.

Fact: I’d much rather be editing videos of my son Logan than writing this blog post.

Fact: All information contained in this post is a fact.

UPDATE: I’ve had a short discussion with Jefferey Bone and he’s going to get specifics from his client and get back to me.

Concrete Equities Investor Meeting June 17th

I just got word via email that there’s a meeting for all Concrete Equities investors:

“There is a general meeting being held for “ALL” investors in Concrete Equities projects, including the Mexico Properties. It is very important that you attend this meeting being held:

Wednesday June 17, 2009 – 7PM
Southside Victory Village
6402 1A ST SW

We are now starting to receive emails from El Golfo investors asking “what is being done”, how does our investment stand”. To this end we have formed a Mexico steering committee and alligned ourselves with the Calgary Buildings Steering Committee.”

If you can be there, you should be there.